Grumpy old fart!!!

"If you talk to God you're religious. If God talks to you, you're psychotic."

A long list of sex acts just got banned in UK porn


Pornography produced in the UK was quietly censored today through an amendment to the 2003 Communications Act, and the measures appear to take aim at female pleasure.

The Audiovisual Media Services Regulations 2014 requires that video-on-demand (VoD) online porn now adhere to the same guidelines laid out for DVD sex shop-type porn by the British Board of Film Censors (BBFC).

Seemingly arbitrarily deciding what is nice sex and what is not nice sex, the board’s ruling on ‘content that is not acceptable’ (p.24) effectively bans the following acts from being depicted by British pornography producers:

Spanking

Caning

Aggressive whipping

Penetration by any object “associated with violence”

Physical or verbal abuse (regardless of  if consensual)

Urolagnia (known as “water sports”)

Role-playing as non-adults

Physical restraint

Humiliation

Female ejaculation

Strangulation

Facesitting

Fisting

The final three listed fall under acts the BBFC views as potentially “life-endangering”.

READ MORE: A HISTORY OF PORN AND CENSORSHIP
WHAT IS NOW BANNED UNDER NEW GOVERNMENT LAWS
COMMENT: THE NEW PORN RESTRICTIONS ARE A BIGGER ATTACK ON OUR FREEDOM THAN YOU THINK

While the measures won’t stop people from watching whatever genre of porn they desire, as video shot abroad can still be viewed, they do impose severe restrictions on content created in the UK, and appear to make no distinction between consensual and non-consensual practices between adults.

 

“There appear to be no rational explanations for most of the R18 rules,” Jerry Barnett of the anti-censorship group Sex and Censorship told Vice UK. “They’re simply a set of moral judgements designed by people who have struggled endlessly to stop the British people from watching pornography.”

More worryingly, the amendment seems to take issue with acts from which women more traditionally derive pleasure than men.

“The new legislation is absurd and surreal,” Itziar Bilbao Urrutia, a dominatrix who produces porn with a feminist theme added to Vice UK. “I mean, why ban facesitting? What’s so dangerous about it? It’s a harmless activity that most femdom performers, myself included, do fully dressed anyway. Its power is symbolic: woman on top, unattainable.”

In a piece for The Independent, award-winning erotic film director Erika Lust said that she believes “we need to rethink what is offensive or dangerous and what is, in fact, normal human nature, and remember that it’s more important to educate than regulate.”

The Department for Culture, Media & Sport insists the BBFC’s R18 certificate is a “tried and tested” method for protecting children.

“The legislation provides the same level of protection to the online world that exists on the high street in relation to the sale of physical DVDs,” a spokesperson told us.

“In a converging media world these provisions must be coherent, and the BBFC classification regime is a tried and tested system of what content is regarded as harmful for minors.”

The Independent, Sunday 7th December 2014

 

 

 

December 7, 2014 - Posted by | Social History, Uncategorized | ,

2 Comments »

  1. I totally agree. It is far better to educate rather than regulate as the industry then goes underground. We need to learn our lessons from the victorian era where society was at its most hypocritical. During victorian times the wealthy procured young working class girls for their flogging pleasure . If they were damaged or managed to expose the guilty they usually were paid off or the guilty managed to discredit them as low class sluts seeking to earn money by dishonourable means

    Comment by Robert Matthias | December 7, 2014 | Reply

    • The real worry is that if governments start with the film industry it could be a short step to include literature, fetish groups and forums. The majority of fetish or alternative activity is between consenting adults who know that they can trust their partner not to abuse them, if we allow legislation to dictate it will as you say drive it underground and so deprive people of the legal safeguards that we currently enjoy.

      Comment by summertime75 | December 8, 2014 | Reply


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: